1. Introduction
1.1. What is ruby?
This subsection is not normative.
Ruby is the commonly-used name for a run of text that appears alongside another run of text (referred to as the “base”) and serves as an annotation or a pronunciation guide associated with that run of text.
The following figures show two examples of Ruby, a simple case and one with more complicated structure.
Example of ruby used in Japanese (simple case)
In Japanese typography, this case is sometimes called taigo ruby (Japanese: 対語ルビ, i.e. per-word ruby) or group-ruby, because the annotation as a whole is associated with multi-character word (as a whole).
Complex ruby with annotation text over and under the base characters
Notice that to reflect the correct association of hiragana characters and their corresponding Kanji base characters, the spacing within the base-level text is adjusted. (This happens around the fourth Kanji character in the figure above, which has a three-character phonetic gloss.) To avoid variable spacing of the base text in the example above, the hiragana annotations can be styled as a merged annotation, which will look more like the group-ruby example earlier. However because the base-annotation pairings are recorded in the ruby structure, if the text breaks across lines, the annotation characters will stay correctly paired with their respective base characters.
In HTML, ruby structure and markup to represent it is described in the Ruby Markup Extension specification. This module describes the CSS rendering model and formatting controls relevant to ruby layout of such markup.
A more in-depth introduction to Ruby and its formatting can be found in the “What is Ruby“ article [QA-RUBY]. Extensive information about the main ways ruby has traditionally been formatted in Japanese can be found in JIS X-4051 [JIS4051] (in Japanese) and in “Ruby and Emphasis Dots” in Requirements for Japanese Text Layout [JLREQ] (in English and Japanese); Rules for Simple Placement of Japanese Ruby [SIMPLE-RUBY] also describes (in English) one possible approach for Japanese ruby formatting. “Interlinear annotations” in Requirements for Chinese Text Layout [CLREQ] describes the related practices for Chinese typography (in Chinese and English).
1.2. Module interactions
This module extends the inline box model of CSS Level 2 [CSS2] to support ruby.
None of the properties in this module apply to the ::first-line or ::first-letter pseudo-elements; however ruby-position can inherit through ::first-line to affect ruby annotations on the first line.
1.3. Value Definitions
This specification follows the CSS property definition conventions from [CSS2] using the value definition syntax from [CSS-VALUES-3]. Value types not defined in this specification are defined in CSS Values & Units [CSS-VALUES-3]. Combination with other CSS modules may expand the definitions of these value types.
In addition to the property-specific values listed in their definitions, all properties defined in this specification also accept the CSS-wide keywords keywords as their property value. For readability they have not been repeated explicitly.
1.4. Diagram conventions
This subsection is not normative.
Many typographical conventions in East Asian typography depend on whether the character rendered is wide (CJK) or narrow (non-CJK). There are a number of illustrations in this document for which the following legend is used:
- Wide-cell glyph (e.g. Han) that is the nth character in the text sequence. They are typically sized to 50% when used as annotations.
- Narrow-cell glyph (e.g. Roman) which is the nth glyph in the text sequence.
The orientation which the above symbols assume in the diagrams corresponds to the orientation that the glyphs they represent are intended to assume when rendered by the user agent. Spacing between these characters in the diagrams is incidental, unless intentionally changed to make a point.
2. Ruby Box Model
The CSS ruby model is based on the W3C HTML5 Ruby Markup model and the XHTML Ruby Annotation Recommendation [RUBY]. In this model, a ruby structure consists of one or more ruby base elements representing the base (annotated) text, associated with one or more levels of ruby annotation elements representing the annotations. The structure of ruby is similar to that of a table: there are “rows” (the base text level, each annotation level) and “columns” (each ruby base and its corresponding ruby annotations).
Sets of consecutive bases and their consecutive annotations are grouped together into ruby segments. Within a ruby segment, a ruby annotation may span multiple ruby bases.
Note: In HTML, a single <ruby> element may contain multiple ruby segments.
(In the XHTML Ruby model, a single <ruby> element can only contain one ruby segment.)
2.1. Ruby-specific display Values
For document languages (such as XML applications) that do not have pre-defined ruby elements, authors must map document language elements to ruby elements; this is done with the display property.
| Name: | display |
|---|---|
| New values: | ruby | ruby-base | ruby-text | ruby-base-container | ruby-text-container |
The following new display values assign ruby layout roles to an arbitrary element:
- ruby
-
Specifies that an element generates a ruby container box.
(Corresponds to HTML/XHTML
<ruby>elements.) - ruby-base
-
Specifies that an element generates a ruby base box.
(Corresponds to HTML/XHTML
<rb>elements.) - ruby-text
-
Specifies that an element generates a ruby annotation box.
(Corresponds to HTML/XHTML
<rt>elements.) - ruby-base-container
-
Specifies that an element generates a ruby base container box.
(Corresponds to XHTML
<rbc>elements; generated as an anonymous box in HTML.) - ruby-text-container
-
Specifies that an element generates a ruby annotation container box.
(Corresponds to HTML/XHTML
<rtc>elements.)
Authors using a language (such as HTML)
that supports dedicated ruby markup
should use that markup rather than
styling arbitrary elements (like <span>)
with ruby display values.
Using the correct markup ensures that screen readers
and non-CSS renderers can interpret the ruby structures.
Note: Replaced elements with a display value of ruby-base, ruby-text, ruby-base-container, and ruby-text-container are treated as inline-level boxes, as per CSS Display 3 § 2.4 Layout-Internal Display Types: the table-* and ruby-* keywords; replaced elements with a display value of ruby or inline ruby behave according to their outer display type, as per CSS Display 3 § 2.1 Outer Display Roles for Flow Layout: the block, inline, and run-in keywords. (See also § 2.1.2 Non-Inline Ruby.)
2.1.1. The Ruby Formatting Context
Ruby containers are non-atomic inline-level boxes. Like regular inline boxes (see CSS Inline Layout 3 § 2 Inline Layout Model), they break across lines, and their containing block is the nearest block container ancestor. And just as the contents of an inline box participate in the same inline formatting context that contains the inline box itself, a ruby container and its base-level contents participate in the same inline formatting context that contains the ruby container itself.
However ruby containers also establish a ruby formatting context that builds further structure around their segment of the inline formatting context in order to host their annotations. Note: this formatting context is not an independent formatting context. Ruby bases, ruby annotations, ruby base containers, and ruby annotation containers are internal ruby boxes: like internal table elements, they have specific roles in ruby layout, and participate in their ruby container’s ruby formatting context. In addition to their role in the ruby formatting context, ruby bases simultaneously participate in the same base-level inline formatting context as the ruby container, while ruby annotations participate in separate annotation-level inline formatting contexts established by the ruby container.
As with the contents of inline boxes, the containing block for the contents of a ruby container (and all its internal ruby boxes) is the containing block of the ruby container. So floats, for example, are trapped by the ruby container’s containing block, not any of the ruby box types.
2.1.2. Non-Inline Ruby
If an element has an inner display type of ruby and an outer display type other than inline, then it generates two boxes: a principal box of the required outer display type type, and an inline-level ruby container. All properties specified on the element apply to the principal box (and if inheritable, inherit to the ruby container box). This allows styling the element as a block, while correctly maintaining the internal ruby structure.
Note: Absolute positioning or floating an element causes its display value to compute to a block-level equivalent. (See [CSS-DISPLAY-3] or [CSS2] section 9.7.) For the internal ruby display types, this causes their display value to compute to block.
2.2. Anonymous Ruby Box Generation
The CSS model does not require that the document language include elements that correspond to each of these components. Missing parts of the structure are implied through the anonymous box generation rules similar to those used to normalize tables. [CSS2]
- Inlinify block-level boxes: Any in-flow boxes directly contained by a ruby container, ruby base container, ruby annotation container, ruby base box, or ruby annotation box are “inlinified” per [CSS-DISPLAY-3]), and their display value computed accordingly, so that they contain only inline-level content. For example, the display property of an in-flow element with display: block parented by an element with display: ruby-text computes to inline-block.
-
Generate anonymous ruby containers:
Any consecutive sequence of
improperly-contained
ruby base containers,
ruby annotation containers,
ruby bases,
and/or
ruby annotations
(and any intervening white space)
is wrapped in an anonymous ruby container.
For the purpose of this step:
- an improperly-contained ruby base is one not parented by a ruby base container or ruby container
- an improperly-contained ruby annotation is one not parented by a ruby annotation container or ruby container
- an improperly-contained ruby base container or ruby annotation container is one not parented by a ruby container
-
Wrap misparented inline-level content:
Any consecutive sequence of text and inline-level boxes
directly parented by a ruby container or ruby base container
is wrapped in an anonymous ruby base.
Similarly, any consecutive sequence of text and inline-level boxes
directly parented by a ruby annotation container
is wrapped in an anonymous ruby annotation.
(For this purpose, misparented internal table elements
are treated as inline-level content
since, being parented by ruby boxes,
they will be ultimately wrapped by an inline-level table wrapper box.)
However, if an anonymous box so constructed contains only white space, it is considered intra-ruby white space and is either discarded or preserved as described below.
- Trim leading/trailing white space: Any intra-ruby white space that is not the sole in-flow child of its parent and is the first or last in-flow child of a ruby container, ruby annotation container, or ruby base container is removed, as if it had display: none
-
Remove inter-level white space:
Any intra-ruby white space
whose immediately adjacent in-flow siblings match one of the patterns below
is inter-level white space
and is removed, as if it had display: none.
Previous box Next box any ruby annotation container not ruby annotation ruby annotation -
Interpret intra-level white space:
Any intra-ruby white space box
whose immediately adjacent in-flow siblings match one of the patterns below
is assigned the box type and subtype defined in the table below:
The intra-level white space boxes defined above are treated specially for pairing and layout. See below.Previous box Next box Box type Subtype ruby base ruby base ruby base inter-base white space ruby annotation ruby annotation ruby annotation inter-annotation white space ruby annotation or ruby annotation container ruby base or ruby base container ruby base inter-segment white space ruby base or ruby base container ruby base container ruby base container ruby base or ruby base container -
Suppress line breaks:
Convert all forced line breaks inside ruby annotations (regardless of white-space value)
as defined for collapsible segment breaks in CSS Text Level 3 § 4.1.2.
The goal of this is to simplify the layout model by suppressing any line breaks within ruby annotations. Alternatively we could try to define some kind of acceptable behavior for them.
- Generate anonymous level containers: Any consecutive sequence of ruby bases and inter-base white space (and not inter-segment white space) not parented by a ruby base container is wrapped in an anonymous ruby base container. Similarly, any consecutive sequence of ruby annotations and inter-annotation white space not parented by a ruby annotation container is wrapped in an anonymous ruby annotation container.
Once all ruby layout structures are properly parented, the UA can start to associate bases with their annotations.
Note: The UA is not required to create any of these anonymous boxes (or the anonymous empty intra-level white space boxes in § 2.3 Annotation Pairing) in its internal structures, as long as pairing and layout behaves as if they existed.
where< ruby > ×< rbc > ×< rb ></ rb > ⬕< rb ></ rb > ×</ rbc > ☒< rtc > ×< rt ></ rt > ⬔< rt ></ rt > ×</ rtc > ◼< rbc > ×< rb ></ rb > …</ rtc > ×</ ruby >
-
× represents discarded leading/trailing white space
-
☒ represents discarded inter-level white space
-
⬕ represents inter-base white space
-
⬔ represents inter-annotation white space
-
◼ represents inter-segment white space
2.3. Annotation Pairing
Annotation pairing is the process of associating ruby annotations with ruby bases. Each ruby annotation is associated with one or more ruby bases, and is said to span those bases. (A ruby annotation that spans multiple bases is called a spanning annotation.)
A ruby base can be associated with only one ruby annotation per annotation level. However, if there are multiple annotation levels, it can be associated with multiple ruby annotations.
Once pairing is complete, ruby columns are defined, each represented by a single ruby base and one ruby annotation (possibly an empty, anonymous one) from each interlinear annotation level in its ruby segment.
2.3.1. Segment Pairing and Annotation Levels
A ruby structure is divided into ruby segments, each consisting of a single ruby base container followed by one or more ruby annotation containers. Each ruby annotation container in a ruby segment represents one level of annotation for the base text: the first one represents the first level of annotation, the second one represents the second level of annotation, and so on. The ruby base container represents the base level. The ruby base container in each segment is thus paired with each of the ruby annotation containers in that segment.
In order to handle degenerate cases, some empty anonymous containers are assumed:
- If the first child of a ruby container is a ruby annotation container, an anonymous, empty ruby base container is assumed to exist before it.
- Similarly, if the ruby container contains consecutive ruby base containers, anonymous, empty ruby annotation containers are assumed to exist between them.
Inter-segment white space is effectively a ruby segment of its own.
2.3.2. Unit Pairing and Spanning Annotations
Within a ruby segment, each ruby base in the ruby base container is paired with one ruby annotation from each ruby annotation container in its ruby segment.
If a ruby annotation container contains only a single, anonymous ruby annotation, then that ruby annotation is paired with (i.e. spans across) all of the ruby bases in its ruby segment.
Otherwise, each ruby annotation is paired, in document order, with the corresponding ruby base in that segment. If there are not enough ruby annotations in a ruby annotation container, the remaining ruby bases are paired with anonymous empty annotations inserted at the end of the ruby annotation container. If there are not enough ruby bases, any remaining ruby annotations pair with empty, anonymous bases inserted at the end of the ruby base container.
If an implementation supports ruby markup with explicit spanning (e.g. XHTML Complex Ruby Annotations), it must adjust the pairing rules to pair spanning annotations to their bases appropriately.
Intra-level white space does not participate in standard annotation pairing. However, if the immediately-adjacent ruby bases or ruby annotations are paired
- with two ruby bases or annotations that surround corresponding intra-level white space in another level, then the so-corresponding intra-level white space boxes are also paired.
- with a single spanning ruby annotation, then the intra-level white space is also paired to that ruby annotation
- with two ruby bases or annotations with no intervening intra-level white space, then the intra-level white space box pairs with an anonymous empty intra-level white space box assumed to exist between them.
|[ s p a n n i n g a n n o t a t i o n ]| |[ a1 ]|[ws]|[ a2 ]|[ ]|[ a3 ]|[ws]|[ a4 ]| |[ b1 ]|[ws]|[ b2 ]|[ws]|[ b3 ]|[ ]|[ b4 ]|
Blue brackets ([ ]) represent base boxes, red brackets ([ ]) represent annotation boxes, gray bars (|) represent the limits of ruby columns, [ws] represents intra-ruby white space, and [] represents an empty anonymous base or annotation automatically generated to pair with intra-ruby white space in another level. Ruby containers, base containers, and annotation containers are omitted.
2.4. Hiding Annotations: visibility: collapse and auto-hidden ruby
A ruby annotation whose visibility is collapse is a hidden annotation. Additionally, if a ruby annotation has the exact same text content as its base, it is automatically (auto-hidden) by the UA.
a ruby annotation does not affect annotation pairing. However the is not visible, and it has no impact on layout other than to separate adjacent sequences of ruby annotation boxes within its level, as if they belonged to separate segments and the ’s base were not a ruby base but an intervening inline.
振り仮名(ふりがな)
and therefore marked up as
< ruby > < rb > 振</ rb >< rb > り</ rb >< rb > 仮</ rb >< rb > 名</ rb > < rp > (</ rp >< rt > ふ</ rt >< rt > り</ rt >< rt > が</ rt >< rt > な</ rt >< rp > )</ rp > </ ruby >
However, when displayed as ruby, the “り” should be hidden
Hiragana ruby for 振り仮名. Notice there is no hiragana annotation above り, since it is already in hiragana.
< ruby >< rb > 昆< rb > 虫< rb > 記< rt > こん< rt class = easy > ちゅう< rt > き</ ruby >
Although some readers might need pronunciation guidance on all three characters, for other audiences it is more appropriate to hide the annotation on the easier character. Applying visibility: collapse enables this hiding:
The behavior of visibility: collapse differs from visibility: hidden—which makes the annotation invisible, but does not remove its impact on layout:
It also differs from display: none because visibility: collapse preserves pairing relationships, whereas display: none removes the box from the tree entirely, disturbing the pairing of any annotations after it:
When the computed value of ruby-merge on the annotation container is merge, is disabled. When that value is auto, the user agent may decide whether to disable of its annotations, but it is recommended to enable if the user agent’s layout algorithm produces the results similar to separate.
The content comparison for
takes place prior to white space collapsing (white-space) and text transformation (text-transform)
and ignores elements (considers only the textContent of the boxes).
Note: Future levels of CSS Ruby may add controls for , but in this level it is always forced.
2.5. White Space Collapsing
As discussed in § 2.2 Anonymous Ruby Box Generation, white space within a ruby structure is discarded:
- at the beginning and end of a ruby container, annotation container, or base container,
- between a base container and its following annotation container,
- between annotation containers.
< ruby > < rb > 東</ rb >< rb > 京</ rb > < rt > とう</ rt >< rt > きょう</ rt > < rtc >< rt > Tō</ rt >< rt > kyō</ rt ></ rtc > </ ruby >
Between ruby segments, between ruby bases, and between ruby annotations, however, white space is not discarded, and is maintained for rendering as inter-base, inter-annotation, or inter-segment white space. (See Interpret intra-level white space, above.)
< ruby > < rb > W</ rb >< rb > W</ rb >< rb > W</ rb > < rt > World</ rt > < rt > Wide</ rt > < rt > Web</ rt > </ ruby >
They also ensure that annotated white space is preserved. For example,
< ruby > < rb > Aerith</ rb >< rb > </ rb >< rb > Gainsborough</ rb > < rt > エアリス</ rt >< rt > ・</ rt >< rt > ゲインズブール</ rt > </ ruby >
Where undiscarded white space is collapsible, it will collapse across adjacent boxes in each line box following the standard white space processing rules [CSS-TEXT-3]. Annotations in separate ruby segments or separated by are not considered adjacent; however all base-level content (including inter-character annotations, which are treated as atomic inlines) is. For collapsible white space between ruby segments (inter-segment white space), the contextual text for determining segment break transformations is thus given by the ruby bases on either side, not necessarily the text on either side of the white space in source document order (which could include interlinear annotations).
< ruby > 屋< rt > おく</ rt > 内< rt > ない</ rt > 禁< rt > きん</ rt > 煙< rt > えん</ rt > </ ruby >
However, white space that does not contain a segment break does not collapse completely away, so this markup will display with a space between the first and second ruby pairs:
< ruby > 屋< rt > おく</ rt > 内< rt > ない</ rt > 禁< rt > きん</ rt > 煙< rt > えん</ rt > </ ruby >
3. Ruby Layout
When a ruby structure is laid out, its base level is initially laid out on the line exactly as if its ruby bases were a regular sequence of inline boxes and the ruby container a regular inline box wrapped around it.
If a ruby container has any inter-character annotations, they are laid out into the base level as detailed in § 3.2 Inter-character Ruby Layout. Subsequently, the base container is sized and interlinear annotations are laid out as detailed in § 3.1 Interlinear Ruby Layout.
As in other CSS layout models, relative positioning, transforms, and other graphical effects apply after this layout of the boxes.
3.1. Interlinear Ruby Layout
Interlinear ruby annotations within a level are initially laid out as if they were inline boxes participating in the same inline formatting context, effectively establishing a line box for that level of annotation in the ruby container. Annotations and bases are aligned to each other by adjusting their spacing as described below.
3.1.1. Inline-axis Interlinear Layout
In the inline axis, interlinear ruby annotations are aligned with respect to their ruby base boxes in accordance with their annotation container’s ruby-merge value.
When ruby-merge is separate, each ruby column is sized to the widest content (ruby base or ruby annotation) in that column. In the case of spanning annotations (whether actually spanning or pretending to span per ruby-merge: merge), if the content of a spanning annotation would be wider than the columns that it spans, then the difference is distributed equally among the spanned columns. If a ruby segment contains multiple spanning annotations, this distribution of additional space is performed starting with the spanning annotations that span the least number of bases, and then in increasing number of bases spanned. Each ruby base and ruby annotation is then sized to exactly span its column(s).
Note: If there are multiple annotations in different levels spanning the same number of bases that overlap but do not coincide, the distribution of space is undefined. Note this is not possible with HTML markup, but can happen in markup languages with explicit spanning such as in [RUBY].
If any ruby annotation in an annotation container with ruby-merge: auto is wider than its base, then ruby annotations in that annotation container may extend outside of their column(s). When they do, their influence on the measure of the columns they intersect is up to the user agent, provided that the ruby segment is made wide enough to fit all its content.
Inter-character annotations are interleaved between columns: they factor into measurement of annotations that span both adjacent columns, but are not included in either column and are never affected by the sizing or positioning of interlinear annotations.
Within each base and annotation box, how the extra space is distributed when its content is narrower than the measure of the box is specified by its ruby-align property.
Blue brackets ([ ]) represent base boxes, red brackets ([ ]) represent annotation boxes, and gray bars (|) represent the limits of ruby columns. Ruby containers, base containers, and annotation containers are omitted.
- Separate / non-spanning:
-
|[ a1 ]|[ a2 ]|[annotation-3]| |[base 1]|[base 2]|[ base 3 ]|
Boxes within each column are sized to match the widest box of that column. The value of ruby-align on each base box and annotation box is used to distribute the extra space in each box.
- Spanning (short):
-
|[ a1 ]|[ short span ]| |[base 1]|[base 2]|[base 3]|
When a spanning annotation is shorter than the spanned bases, there is no extra space to distribute to these bases. Extra space within the spanning annotation is distributed according to ruby-align on that annotation box, as for non spanning ones.
- Spanning (long):
-
|[ a1 ]|[spanning annotation]| |[base 1]|[ base 2 ]|[ base 3 ]|
When the spanning annotation is longer than the spanned base boxes, the extra space is distributed equally between them.
- Merged (short):
-
|[merged annotation]| |[base 1]|[base 2]|[base 3]|
A merged annotation behaves similarly to a spanning one, except that distribution of any extra space in it is determined by the value of ruby-align on the annotation container, not on any of its annotation boxes.
- Several levels, with spanning annotation:
-
|[ a1 ]|[ annotation-2 ]|[ a3 ]| |[long annotation spanning all content]| |[ base 1 ]|[ base 2 ]|[ base 3 ]|
|[ xx ]|[annotation spanning bases]| |[ a1 ]|[ annotation-2 ]|[ a3 ]| |[base 1]|[ base 2 ]|[ base 3 ]|
In these two examples with multiple levels, each column is sized to its longest content, and spanning annotations that are still longer than the sum of the columns that they span grow them further, adding to each equally.
- Several levels, with multiple spanning annotations:
-
|[ xx ]|[ annotation spanning bases ]| |[ a1 ]|[ annotation-2 ]|[ a3 ]| |[lengthy annotation spanning base content]| |[ base 1 ]|[ base 2 ]|[ base 3 ]|
When there are multiple spanning annotations, those that span fewest bases are processed first. In this case, the green one, which spans two bases, is processed before the orange one, which spans three. Changing this order would change the distribution of space.
To help identify which spanning annotation is responsible for which extra spacing, in this diagram the color of the text in each spanning annotation is matched with the background color of spacing it adds to other boxes.
3.1.2. Block-axis Interlinear Layout
Define the extent to which vertical-align affects these ruby boxes. See Issue 4987.
Each base container is then sized and positioned to contain exactly all of its ruby bases’ margin boxes—and all their associated inter-character ruby annotation margin boxes, if any—as well as the base and annotation containers of any descendant ruby containers also participating in this inline formatting context. (If a base container has no in-flow content, it is sized and positioned as if it contained a single empty ruby base.)
Each interlinear annotation container is sized and positioned to contain exactly all of its ruby annotations’ margin boxes as well as the base and annotation containers of any descendant ruby containers also participating in this annotation level’s inline formatting context. (If an annotation container has no in-flow content, it is sized and positioned as if it contained a single empty ruby annotation.) These annotation containers are then stacked outward over or under (depending on ruby-position) their corresponding base container, without any intervening space, thus determining the block-axis positioning of the ruby annotations with respect to their ruby bases.
Should block-axis margins collapse? This makes layout more robust, but is inconsistent with how inlines behave along the inline-axis.
3.2. Inter-character Ruby Layout
Inter-character annotations have special layout. Inter-character ruby annotation boxes are spliced into and measured as part of the layout of the base level. Each ruby annotation is inserted to the right of the ruby base it is paired with; a spanning inter-character annotation is placed after the rightmost of all the bases that it spans. Inter-character ruby annotations are laid out exactly like inline blocks, except as described below.
Note: As per the definition of inter-character, inter-character annotations always have a vertical-rl writing-mode, and only exist in horizontal ruby containers.
Each ruby annotation is placed immediately to the right of the relevant ruby base, before any inter-base white space (or inter-segment white space). If multiple inter-character ruby annotation boxes are placed against the same ruby base, their margin boxes are stacked rightwards without intervening space, in increasing level order.
If the automatic height of the ruby annotation box’s content area would be shorter than the height of the content box of the ruby base after which it is placed, its content box height is increased to match that height exactly.
The alignment of the ruby annotation box depends on the ruby-align property on the ruby annotation:
- If ruby-align is start, the top edge of the ruby annotation’s content box is aligned with the top edge of the ruby base’s content box.
- Otherwise, the center of the ruby annotation’s content box is vertically aligned with the center of the ruby base’s content box.
The ruby annotation container box of an inter-character annotation is sized and placed so that its content box coincides exactly with that of the ruby base container box.
Note: The size and position of inter-character ruby annotation container boxes has no effect on layout. The above definition is merely so that programmatically inquiring about them produces deterministic results.
For the purpose of alignment and column sizing (as discussed in § 3 Ruby Layout), inter-character ruby annotations are not considered to be part of the same column as the base to with they are attached; rather, they effectively form a column of their own.
3.3. Styling Ruby Boxes
Ruby bases and ruby containers are treated as inline boxes, and all properties that apply to inline boxes, unless otherwise specified, also apply to them in the same way. However, the line-relative shift values of vertical-align (top, bottom) must be ignored (treated as zero).
All properties that apply to inline boxes, unless otherwise specified, also apply to ruby annotations in the same way, except line-height, which does not apply. Also, the line-relative shift values of vertical-align (top, bottom) must be ignored (treated as zero).
Neither the margin, padding, and border properties nor any of the properties that do not apply to inline boxes apply to base containers or